My ELS

|

About ELS

|

Help

|

Contact us

|

Logout

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Home

 

What's New

 

Search

 

Browse

Top of Form

 

 

Bottom of Form

 

Bottom of Form

 

 

 

 

 

 

Contents

 

 

Introduction: Why Study Geographical Variation?

Creating and Maintaining Geographical Variation

Clinal Variation

Genetic versus Environmental Causes of Variation

Studies of Geographical Variation

Relation to Principles of Divergence and Adaptive Radiation

References

Further Reading

 

 

 

Figures

 

 

Figure 1

Figure 2

Figure 3

Figure 4

Figure 5

Figure 6

Figure 7

 

 

 

Download PDF

 

How to cite

 

Permissions

 

Related articles

 

 

Geographical Variation

 

Timothy A Mousseau University of South Carolina, Columbia, South Carolina, USA

Alexander E Olvido University of Nebraska, Lincoln, Nebraska, USA

 

Advanced

Advanced

 

doi:10.1038/npg.els.0001736

 

 

Geographical variation refers to differences among populations of organisms in genetically based traits across the geographical range of that species.

 

 

Introduction: Why Study Geographical Variation?

 

Elucidating the mechanisms that create and maintain geographical variation can reveal important facets of evolution. Since evolutionary response depends on genetic variation, factors affecting the amount of genetic variation within and among populations are of fundamental importance. The study of geographical variation can provide insights to the adaptive mechanisms that operate in the wild, and ultimately in the divergence of populations into genetically distinct units, i.e. species. Thus geographical variation is the starting point for understanding the generation of biodiversity. Further, an understanding of the genetic basis to geographical variation that presently exists may provide the basis for predicting how populations and species will adapt to future environmental changes.

 

The factors that give rise to genetic variation in a population are also responsible for creating and maintaining geographical variation. It is useful to divide these factors into two groups: random effects that arise as a function of population size, mutation rates, demography and proximity to other populations, and those that result from the effects of natural selection.

 

Creating and Maintaining Geographical Variation

 

In populations of finite size, random genetic drift will promote the loss of genetic variation as well as changes in allele frequencies (Figure 1). The effects of drift are inversely proportional to population size, with small populations showing the greatest effects. In the absence of mutation or immigration small populations will eventually lose much of their genetic variation due to drift. Also, populations that are initiated by few individuals will tend to be different from other such populations as a consequence of founder effects (Figure 2). Founder effects occur because founders will have a small random selection of the genes found in the parental population. These properties of small population sizes are of great importance to conservation biology. However, most populations experience some degree of genetic mutation that will tend to maintain genetic variation. In addition, although gene flow among populations will maintain local variation it will also act to homogenize variation among populations (Figure 3). Without gene flow, the original species range will become fragmented into localized gene pools. Over time, as a consequence of genetic isolation, founder effects and drift, populations are expected to diverge. See alsoDrift: theoretical aspects

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Figure 1
The effects of population size on random genetic drift. This figure was created using the Populus computer simulation program available from Dr Donald Alstad at the
University of Minnesota (http://biosci.cbs.umn.edu/software/populus.html). The top panel illustrates the rapid loss of genetic variation often observed in small populations. The bottom panel demonstrates that large populations ar ...

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Figure 2
Founder effects and population differentiation. When a new population is initiated by one or a few individuals dispersing from a larger, genetically heterogeneous source population, these ‘satellite’ populations may have different gene frequencies from the source (and from each other) as a result of founder effects. Founder effects are believed to play a role in rapid divergence and speciati ...

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Figure 3
The effects of migration on genetic variation within and among populations. In small populations any migration among populations will tend to eliminate genetic differentiation and increase genetic variation within populations (top). In the absence immigration, genetic drift will lead to differentiation among populations and the loss of genetic variation within populations (bottom). ...

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Environmental differences due to biotic or abiotic factors between regions can also lead to variation among populations that is a result of natural selection. For example, the presence or absence of predators, parasites, hosts or competitors are biotic factors that can select for geographical variation. Variation in climate and nutrient availability are examples of abiotic factors that can result in geographic variation among populations. The degree of divergence among populations will reflect a balance between the effects of selection imposed on local populations, and the amount of gene flow among divergent populations. In regions of high gene flow (i.e. immigration among populations) selection must be very strong in order to maintain genetically based differences among populations. In the absence of gene flow local populations can respond to local selection unimpeded by the deleterious effects of gene flow from neighbouring populations.

 

Clinal Variation

 

A particularly interesting form of geographical variation is a cline, or ‘a gradient in a measurable character’ (Endler, 1977, p. 6). Clines can be organized into two general categories, graded and stepped, although the distinction may only depend on the scale of investigation and not really on the environmental differences that produce the cline. Regardless of perspective, clines can signify adaptive responses of organisms to natural selection. Clines are frequently observed in response to variation in latitude, altitude, ocean or lake depth, or nutrient gradients (Figure 4). The observation of repeated, independently evolved clines can be very strong evidence for the action of natural selection on organismal variation. For example, a number of cricket species from Japan and North America show similar latitudinal clines in body size with body size smallest in northern populations. The fact that this clinal pattern has evolved independently in several different systems and geographical locations strongly supports the hypothesis that natural selection favours small size in cold, northern environments.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Figure 4
Clinal variation
in body size. When a trait shows gradual change along an environmental gradient (e.g. latitude or altitude) this is called a cline. Many endotherms (e.g. birds and mammals) show an increase in body size from south to north, and a pattern of variation known as Bergmann’s rule. Many ectotherms (e.g. insects) show the ‘converse to Bergmann’s rule’, whereby body size decreases w ...

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Genetic versus Environmental Causes of Variation

 

Patterns of variation in the wild can result either from genetically based differences among populations, or from the effects of environmental variation. Many organisms display some degree of phenotypic plasticity that is caused by differences in the environment. For example, humans tan in response to ultraviolet radiation, while trees grown in shade tend to have larger leaves than the same trees grown in direct sunlight. Given the widespread incidence of environmentally induced plasticity, it is quite possible that many of the reported cases of geographical variation in plants and animals are the result of development in different environments and not due to genetically based differences among populations. This distinction is critical since only genetically based differences among populations are likely to result in local adaptation and speciation. The simplest test for the genetic basis to variation among populations is the common garden experiment. Here representatives from each study population are raised in a greenhouse or in the laboratory in a common environment. If phenotypic differences persist following two or more generations in a common environment this provides strong evidence for genetic differences among the study populations. It is important that common garden tests be conducted for several generations (minimum of two) since environmental effects are often transmitted to offspring via maternal effects that can extend for several generations. The common garden approach can be extended to multiple environments to determine if similarities or differences among populations are consistent under a variety of rearing conditions. For organisms that cannot be raised in the laboratory, the reciprocal transplant technique can be used. In this design individuals from two or more populations are reciprocally transplanted into each of the environments. As with the common garden technique, if phenotypic differences persist even when individuals are reared side-by-side in the different environments, this provides strong evidence that phenotypic differences are genetically based. As with the simple common garden approach it is necessary to conduct the experiment through two or more generations to remove potentially confounding maternal effects.

 

Studies of Geographical Variation

 

Sickle cell anaemia and balanced polymorphism in human populations

 

Human populations display a wide range of genetically based variation. Perhaps the best known concerns the distribution of alleles for sickle cell anaemia. The sickle cell allele results from an amino acid substitution at the structural-gene locus for the β chain of haemoglobin. The abnormal haemoglobin crystallizes at low oxygen tension, and the red blood cells deform and haemolyse. Individuals with two sickle cell alleles (i.e. homozygotes) have severe anaemia, and survivorship is low. Heterozygotes (i.e. one sickle cell allele and one normal allele) have a mild anaemia and under ordinary circumstances have the same or only slightly lower fitness than normal homozygotes. However, in regions of Africa with a high incidence of the malarial parasite, Plasmodium falciparum, heterozygotes have a higher fitness than normal homozygotes because the presence of some sickling haemoglobin protects them from malaria by selective removal of the parasite from the bloodstream. Where malaria is absent, as in North America, the fitness advantage of heterozygosity is lost. In this case, geographic variation in the incidence of malaria (a biotic factor) selects for genetic variation in human populations. See alsoFitness

 

Warfarin resistance in wild rats

 

The brown rat, Rattus norvegicus, has evolved resistance to the rodenticide, warfarin, in regions where this chemical has been used to control population size. Warfarin is an anticoagulant that prevents blood clotting via disruption of the vitamin K cycle. Studies have shown that a single, dominant gene controls resistance to warfarin and that different alleles have independently evolved in different geographical locations (Greaves, 1985). As with sickle cell anaemia in humans, the alleles bestowing resistance to warfarin in rats are believed to be maintained as a consequence of heterozygote advantage in regions where rats are extensively poisoned. Individuals that possess two resistance alleles suffer impairment of the vitamin K cycle and may have lower fitness in the wild due to dramatically increased needs for dietary sources of vitamin K, while homozygous susceptible genotypes are prone to death in regions where warfarin is used as a pesticide. Recently, it has been found that heterozygous individuals from a population from southern England suffer no fitness costs and may have an advantage over homozygous susceptible genotypes even in the absence of poison (Smith et al., 1993). It is very likely that this new resistance allele, which shows no cost, will spread to other populations even in the absence of warfarin use. See alsoVitamin K: structure and function

 

Industrial melanism in the peppered moth

 

Industrial melanism in the peppered moth, Biston betularia, is another well-documented case of a trait that behaves as a single-locus polymorphism. For a thorough review of this phenomenon see Majerus (1998). The peppered moth possesses several genetically based colour polymorphisms that result from different alleles. There are three basic forms of B. betularia, with several grades of melanism in between each: carbonaria (fully melanic), insularia (dark with white speckling or white fringes on wings), and typica (speckled).

 

From the mid-1700s onward, coal production and consumption changed the landscape of many northern European cities. Particularly in and around industrialized areas, lichens that once covered tree trunks disappeared, probably as a consequence of acid rains, and were replaced with ash and soot from the accompanying smoke. Numerous studies since then (e.g. Bleasdale, 1952; Went, 1955; Hawksworth